Dan Onorato was endorsed by my union, the PSEA, because he is a pro-education candidate. Beyond the education front, Onorato is absolutely solid and a much better package than Tom Corbett, who has suffered from foot-in-mouth disease.
Yesterday, Onorato took to the stage with Anthony Williams, who ran for governor as a school choice Democrat from Philadelphia financed by four super-rich hedge fund managers. While on stage, Onorato talked up school choice. Obviously, this doesn’t sit well with me. I love Onorato. I hate school choice (I’ve written about this enough times that I won’t rehash why this is a disaster).
I decided to give Onorato a brief benefit of the doubt, took some deep breaths, thought it through, called some union contacts and campaign people.
While Onorato’s school choice feelings don’t sound like him, he still plans to fund our public schools equitably, he still plans to work for better teacher preparation programs, he still favors fixing our pension system. Most importantly, and what makes him unique, is that he still supports teachers having a voice in the education process. Believe it or not, we tend not to. Policy that we follow is dictated to us by legislators and politicians, most often (think Race to the Top).
Anthony Williams plays a big part in this. He’s sitting on $5 million after his gubernatorial loss. Onorato needs to come out very strong in Philadelphia to win this race. Having Williams on his side, in terms of votes and cash, makes a lot of sense. I hate to be cynical, but that is politics. In the end, Onorato is a far better candidate than Corbett, school choice or not.
