$200 a month.
Does that mean a lot to you? Maybe it will pay a few bills. Maybe it will pay for groceries or something essential to your living.
Do middle-class or rich people depend on $200 to live? No. Would losing $200 a month change your lifestyle? Somewhat, but unless you’re counting your pennies, you could get by without $200.
Who thinks you, a poor person, probably on food stamps, could get by without a much needed $200 a month – PA Republican Legislators (and a few heartless Democrats.)
What poor people rely on $200 a month? Disabled adults, numbering in the tens of thousands, who are unable to work.
King Corbett and his cronies decided, who needs money more? People at the very bottom of society or “the race horse industry?” People struggling to get by every month on minimal money or the Legislature?
If you think Republicans would pick those in need over race horses or themselves, you don’t know what a Republican is.
Corbett is a no-new-tax guy. If the state doesn’t have the money, it won’t pay for services. If it comes down to helping those in need or giving a corporation unneeded benefits, as a Republican, a corporation wins – it always wins.
$27.7 billion – that’s the PA budget.
Gone is $200 for people who need it. Race horse industry gets money.
“House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny, suggested that the House..was unlikely to change the elimination of the General Assistance cash benefit when it considers the Senate’s plan.”
“I think that our colleagues have made an important policy statement and many of us feel that … they’re headed in the right direction,” Turzai said. “There’s aspects to the program that are too discretionary and they need (to be) reformed at a minimum.”
“Asked why the state couldn’t keep the program while improving it, Turzai responded: “I think there’s just been a history of abuse that’s been shown there, and it needs further reform and further reduction.”"
Turzai cited an (imaginary) audit by the state’s Auditor General. Why is it an imaginary audit? Because the Auditor General never audited the General Assistance cash benefit program.
But wait there’s fraud! (Remember there was voter fraud (according to Republicans) so let’s make voting harder!)
July 1, 2010, to present, out of tens of thousands of users, “investigations found 86 prosecutions that resulted in guilty pleas or convictions.” So because of a few, everyone relying on the program gets screwed.
Corbett cronies say the program must go because of welfare costs rising. Makes sense does it not? End the program people rely on because the program is being used too much by too many people.
“Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Jake Corman, R-Centre, said senators had other priorities when they were deciding which of Corbett’s proposed cuts to soften.” “We obviously didn’t have enough to fill every hole and we prioritized as best as we could,” Corman said.
When there’s a cut to be made, why not start with programs people rely on? Would you rather cut money from the poor or find a way to make cuts in some other area? You already said you won’t raise revenue because you’re dumb, so lets look on the class scale and see who gets screwed. Do we start with the wealthiest? No, there’s not many of them, we’ll start with the poor.
Don’t worry poor people, there are people looking out for you. The Governor? No. Your elected officials? No. Lobbyist/Special interest groups? No.
Oh wait, there is nobody looking out for you because you’re poor and you don’t contribute to elected officials campaigns. You’re on your own, literally and figuratively, because you have no money and you’ll have even less because, well who cares why?